If you’re a property owner, manager, or maintenance personnel, you’re probably familiar with the headache that comes with potholes, cracks, and other forms of pavement damage. Repairing damaged pavement is crucial to preventing further deterioration and avoiding costly reconstruction. But with so many pavement repair methods available, which one should you choose? Lets compare two popular pavement repair methods: infrared asphalt repair and traditional patching. We’ll look at the pros and cons of each method and help you decide which one is better suited to your pavement repair needs.
What is Infrared Asphalt Repair?
Infrared asphalt repair is a pavement repair method that uses infrared radiation to heat up and soften the damaged pavement. This makes it easier to remove the damaged pavement and mix it with fresh asphalt to create a seamless repair.
How Does Infrared Asphalt Repair Work?
The process of infrared asphalt repair involves the following steps:
- The damaged pavement is cleaned and prepared for repair.
- An infrared heater is used to heat up the damaged pavement to a temperature of approximately 350-400°F.
- The softened pavement is then removed using a variety of tools, such as rakes, shovels, and air compressors.
- The area is then cleaned and prepared for fresh asphalt.
- Fresh asphalt is mixed and poured into the area and compacted to create a seamless repair.
Advantages of Infrared Asphalt Repair
Infrared asphalt repair is a faster method of repairing pavement damage compared to traditional patching. The infrared heating process can be completed in as little as 5-10 minutes, and the repair can be completed within an hour.
Infrared asphalt repairs are more durable and long-lasting compared to traditional patching methods. The seamless repair created by infrared asphalt repair is less prone to water infiltration and can withstand heavy traffic.
Infrared asphalt repair is an environmentally friendly method of repairing pavement damage. The process does not require the use of new asphalt or other materials, reducing waste and preserving natural resources.
Disadvantages of Infrared Asphalt Repair
Limited to Surface-level Damage
Infrared asphalt repair is only suitable for repairing surface-level pavement damage, such as potholes and cracks. Deeper damage may require traditional patching or reconstruction
Requires Skilled Operators
Infrared asphalt repair requires skilled operators who have experience in using the specialized equipment required for the process. This can increase the cost of repairs and may make it difficult to find qualified operators in some areas.
Higher Upfront Cost
The upfront cost of infrared asphalt repair can be higher compared to traditional patching. The specialized equipment required for the process can be expensive, which may increase the cost of repairs.
What is Traditional Patching?
Traditional patching is a pavement repair method that involves removing the damaged pavement and replacing it with fresh asphalt or concrete.
How Does Traditional Patching Work?
The process of traditional patching involves the following steps:
- The damaged pavement is removed using saws, jackhammers, or other tools.
- The area is then cleaned and prepared for fresh asphalt or concrete.
- Fresh asphalt or concrete is poured into the area and compacted to create a new surface.
Advantages of Traditional Patching
Suitable for All Types of Damage
Traditional patching is suitable for repairing all types of pavement damage, including deep cracks and potholes. This makes it a versatile option for repairing pavement damage.
Requires Minimal Equipment
Traditional patching requires minimal equipment compared to infrared asphalt repair. This can make it a more cost-effective option for repairing pavement damage.
Lower Upfront Cost
The upfront cost of traditional patching is generally lower compared to infrared asphalt repair. This can make it a more affordable option for repairing pavement damage.
Disadvantages of Traditional Patching
Longer Repair Time
Traditional patching can take longer to complete compared to infrared asphalt repair. The process of removing the damaged pavement and pouring fresh asphalt or concrete can take several hours or even days to complete.
Shorter Lifespan of Repairs
Traditional patching repairs are generally less durable and have a shorter lifespan compared to infrared asphalt repairs. The seams between the old and new pavement can be prone to water infiltration and can break down over time.
Not Environmentally Friendly
Traditional patching is not an environmentally friendly method of repairing pavement damage. The process requires the use of new asphalt or concrete, which can contribute to the depletion of natural resources.
Which Method is Better?
The choice between infrared asphalt repair and traditional patching depends on a variety of factors, including the type and extent of damage, time constraints, budget, and environmental concerns. In general, infrared asphalt repair is a faster, more durable, and environmentally friendly option for repairing surface-level pavement damage. However, it may not be suitable for repairing deeper damage, and the upfront cost can be higher compared to traditional patching. Traditional patching is a more versatile and cost-effective option for repairing all types of pavement damage, but it can take longer to complete and may not be as durable as infrared asphalt repairs. Ultimately, the best method for repairing pavement damage depends on the specific circumstances of each project.